top of page

From Child Protection to Paradigm Protection—The Genesis, Development, and Defense of a Scientific Paradigm

A scientific paradigm typically embraces research norms and values, such as truth-seeking, critical thinking, disinterestedness, and good scientific practice. These values should prevent a paradigm from introducing defective assumptions. But sometimes, scientists who are also physicians develop clinical norms that are in conflict with the scientific enterprise. As an example of such a conflict, we have analyzed the genesis and development of the shaken baby syndrome (SBS) paradigm. The point of departure of the analysis is a recently conducted systematic literature review, which concluded that there is very low scientific evidence for the basic assumption held by Child Protection Teams: when certain signs are present (and no other “acceptable” explanations are provided) the infant has been violently shaken. We suggest that such teams have developed more value-based than scientific-based criteria when classifying SBS cases. Further, we suggest that the teams are victims of “groupthink,” aggravating the difficulties in considering critics’ questioning the criteria established by the teams.


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Osteogenesis Imperfecta & Benskörhet

Gabriels sjukdom orsakade frakturen som läkaren misstänkte var misshandel: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/granskning/ug/gabriels-sjukdom-orsa...

Benskörhet & Rakit

Vad är Rakit och hur visar sig symptomen? https://www.jstor.org/stable/7260?seq=1

Comments


©2021 by RFFR

RIKSFÖRBUNDET FÖR FAMILJERS RÄTTIGHETER (RFFR)

Org.nr: 802534-2539

Uppsala 

bottom of page